Reputation Management Online Defamation

"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on.“
Winston Churchill

Research suggests that over 85% of purchasers research the web for reviews and feedback before making a purchase and 70% of potential customers will not make an inquiry if they read negative mentions of a brand or company. In this era of socially driven content, review sites and citizen journalist it has become very easy to become a victim of negative comments from anonymous sources. These comments can come from unhappy clients, ex employees, Partners or Suppliers and even Competitors. The comments are often one sided, out dated, deliberately false and/or lack context.

Negative comments and potential defamatory statements can spread like a virus, reaching tens if not hundreds of thousands of people around the world. Active management is needed to avoid reputational risk to your Company including actively managing social media, forums, blogs, search engines and other websites for negative comments.

For a Defendant to be to be liable for defamation, they must be a publisher of the statement and this includes all those who published the statement including the primary publisher and secondary publishers. Every ‘Re-Tweet’ or ‘Share’ constitutes a fresh publication.

It is possible for an Internet Service Provider or website owner to be liable for the content of the sites which they host / own once they have been put on notice of the existence of the comments and they fail to act to remove the postings.

Our specialist solicitors are able to advise you in relation to a statement which has been published and to avoid the risk to your business. We can assist with the effective removal of the statement and protect your Companies reputation

Case Study

We have recently acted for a property development company who had a development which failed. This left 100’s of clients with negative views about our Client which were posted on a variety of leading internet forums. The negative comments affected our client’s sales on other developments.  After gathering evidence of all the relevant defamatory postings we achieved complete removal of over 15 negative forum threads/blogs and over 100 other negative postings from other forums and websites. 

Latest Blogs

Due Diligence (cont)

Due Diligence (Part 2) What you need to do In the second part of this article we will be covering the scope of the investigation The scope of the investigation will need to cover various areas relating to the business and its affairs, for example: ...

Due Diligence

Due Diligence (Part 1) What is Due Diligence? A due diligence review is an independent investigation of the target business by the buyer and its advisers. In English law, the principle of “caveat emptor” or “buyer beware”...

GDPR - one year on it's not just all about emails

What have the changes, if anything been for businesses – we look at what has happened in the past 12 months and what you might have to plan for the future It’s been almost 12 months since businesses were all panicking about GDPR , here is Q...

Directors' Duties - The do's and don'ts

  As a company director you are responsible for the day-to-day running of the business and accountable for its success or failure. According to the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) there are seven specific duties you need to observe: to act within...

Director Who Flouted Ban Given Jail Sentence

Ignoring a court ruling is a foolish strategy at any time – as a man who continued to act as a director after having been banned from doing so found recently. In 2011, the man had agreed to a four-year ban after being involved in the running of a...

Latest News

Hotel Under Duty to Protect Guests Against Third-Party Criminal Acts

Can businesses owe a duty to protect customers on their premises from the criminal acts of others? In a test case concerning a horrific attack on three hotel guests , the High Court has ruled that, in certain circumstances, the answer to that question is...

Lack of Due Diligence Gives Company Buyer Four Days in Court

When the sale of a company is taking place, it is usual for warranties to be given regarding how the company being sold has conducted its affairs prior to the sale. Making sure these are accurate is essential. In a recent case, the purchaser of a company...

Owner of Fire-Damaged Factory Triumphs in High Court Insurance Dispute

Almost all businesses are insured against fire damage but, when the worst happens, insurers are understandably anxious to make sure they do not pay out any more than they have to. That situation provides fertile ground for dispute, which was certainly so...

New Company Disclosure Requirements On the Way

The trend towards full disclosure and openness continues unabated in business, and new regulations are being mooted which will increase the amount of disclosure required of UK-registered companies regarding their principals. Currently, even the smallest...

Pension Trustees Owe No Duty of Care to Employer

Many directors of companies are also trustees of the company pension scheme. Sometimes, their duties as a director and as a scheme trustee can be difficult to reconcile. In a recent case, a company alleged that two directors who were trustees of the firm's...